Bank Malad Idaho, Main Elevation

Slow film and slow development. Kodak 2238 shot at ISO 12. Stand developed for 2 hours in glycin-carbonate (15 grams Sodium sulfite, 60 grams sodium carbonate, 15 grams glycin in 2 liters of water) – stock solution (Lowe’s recipe). Dilute 1:10 for working solution. Water stop, Ilford Hypam 1:4 fix for 6 minutes. Very minimal streaking due to 1:1 sodium sulfite to glycin. Scanned as color and some tinting appears in post production on some prints.

Fotografo:
mike1allison
Caricato:
2021-01-17
Tags:
1:10 2238 35mm Minolta 28-85 AF zoom macro lens. dilution abandoned analog analogue architecture art b&w black & white black and white building bw byn chiaroscuro cityscape cold compensation condemned dark decay decrepit demo demolition develop dingy edwal film filmisnotdead filmneverdied fun glycin carbonate glycin-carbonate itsfilm kodak landscape lomo lomography low key lowe minolta maxxum 5 misty mountain mountains nature noir outdoors outside overcast panchro panchromatic pulverantilist schwarz weiss sepia shadow snow stand stand development story sw test travel vintage winter
Fotocamera:
Minolta Maxxum 5
Pellicola:
Eastman Kodak 2238 Panchromatic Separation
Obiettivo:
Minolta AF Macro Zoom 28-85
Cittá:
Malad City, Idaho
Paese:
United States
Album:
Slow Film and Slow Development - Kodak 2238, ISO 12, Stand Developed 2 Hours

3 Commenti

  1. charliedontsurf
    charliedontsurf ·

    Interesting that you've got a halo effect going on here around the building. I've heard it said that it can appear with stand development, I quite like it especially in portraits.

  2. mike1allison
    mike1allison ·

    @charliedontsurf yes I usually am able to get that out. This is one of those times I didn't notice it. There is another shot here that I couldn't level it out to save me so I just made it a feature. Lol

  3. mike1allison
    mike1allison ·

    @charliedontsurf I was excited to try this glycin developer. I used it 1:10 for 2 hours, I think it needs to be closer to 1:50. There is a lot of development and a lot of white blow out even though at best the lens was 3.5 or slower. Im going to give it a shot. Maybe shoot the 2238 at 16 or 25 iso? I dunno. Lol

Altre foto di mike1allison